School SHOULD be FUN…


School should be fun.

That statement might strike you either as trivially obvious, or as a worryingly subversive thing to say.

For those in the latter camp, your resistance might be due to one or more of the following beliefs:

  1. “Life in general isn’t supposed to be fun – it’s something that we need to get through to have fun in the next life.”
  2. “Fun is a shallow proxy for deeper, more meaningful routes to happiness, so yes – school should be ‘happy’, but fun is a distraction.”
  3. “Fun is something that comes once you’ve put in the work. At school you earn the right to have fun later in life.”
  4. “A focus on fun can divert schools from the real business of ‘learning’, so it’s best not to point out its importance.”
  5. “My school years weren’t fun, so why should anybody else’s be? Life is a grind and you need to get used to it.”

If you believe number 1, then there isn’t much I can do to change your mind. Indeed I’ve spent a fair amount of my life with a similar martyr’s view of just getting through to the other side.

I have some sympathy with number 2. As with foods, there are some pleasures in life which seem to last longer and be more satisfying than others, and I think it is worth trying to educate children about that. However, it’s quite easy to slip into a puritanical moralising on this matter to the point that it’s considered better to have no pleasure rather than the shallow kind.

Numbers 3 and 4 also contain grains of truth which I will reflect-upon in my subsequent blogs, but my overall rejection of them is covered in my consideration of number 5, which to me is the most worrying belief.

Essentially, number 5 is just emotionally bitter. If we just believe that life simply is ‘tough’ and “who ever said that life should be fun?” then I wonder why we consider the human race as something worth perpetuating. I’ve been prompted recently to reflect on the philosophy of Antinatalism, which effectively posits that ‘not-existing’ is neither good nor bad, but that human existence is predominantly unpleasant, therefore it is immoral to have children and force another person to have to go through the misery of existence. Consequently, we should stop having children and let the race die-out…

This seems as extreme as a human philosophy could get, but such is the seriousness with which it is currently entertained, that philosopher Thomas Metzinger has recently mused about the possibility of a future artificial super-intelligence benevolently putting the human race out of its misery – purely for our own good.

Whatever your take on the antinatalist thesis, I think we should recognise that there really is no moral value in forcing children to grit their teeth as a whole through childhood, and ‘delay gratification’ until they are free to choose their own path. Additionally, it’s not enough to just pass the buck that fun is something they should be having at home, or just during the play-times. Effectively, school-children are prisoners in lives which they have very little choice over. We have a moral duty to ensure that whilst their lives are being force-fed to them by us in school  these lives are actually experienced as being joyous and worth living in the present.

There simply is no justification for denying them fun on the basis that that’s not the purpose of school, any more than we should be denying them safety and hygiene in schools.

Is fun necessary for learning? No. Is it sufficient for learning? No. Can or should every moment of schooling be fun? No.

But overall, school should be fun – and that includes lessons. It should create a guaranteed and ring-fenced positive first stage to human life (a “welcome gift” from an advanced society) which is joyous, pleasurable, and worth living in itself. Or else we really should be questioning what moral value there is to us bringing a new generation to life in the first place.

If ‘fun’ still sounds somehow wrong to you, replace it everywhere you see it above with either ‘joy‘ or ‘joyous‘ and see if you still reject it…

9 thoughts on “School SHOULD be FUN…

  1. this reminds me a little of Thomas Sowell’s ‘vision of the anointed.’ School ‘should be fun’ like there ‘should be equality in the world’ – when there never will be. We can strive to make school an enjoyable place for all students but the reality of human existence, even for children, means it will have as many highs as lows, and no matter what we do, be a miserable experience for some. That’s why I like Michaela School’s approach of teaching stoicism to students.

    Liked by 2 people

    • I think childhood will inevitably have lows that we can never hope to irradicate, and I whole-heartedly agree with the delusion regarding equality in the world. I think however that if it is not built-into the notion of our education system that it should – as a design feature – include more highs for children than lows, then I do query what principle we’re using for continuing to breed as a race.

      Stoicism is brilliant as something that those of us who are here need to embrace to help us get through to the end, but I still query what it says about us as a species that we’ll knowingly bring children into being who we know are just going to have to deal with it, coz “that’s what life is all about.”


      • Do we need to know how to cope with highs in life too? Possibly but the focus on learning how to cope with the lows is not in my mind because “life sucks” rather that negative experiences can be debilitating if we don’t know how to deal with them. Positive experiences we just tend to ride on a high.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. I think you are making a fundamental error of judgment here. I don’t think school should be boring and horrible for children, I loved my schooling precisely because it wasn’t.

    What I object to is the manufactured fun that teachers (especially in the primary sector) have been forced to generate in the hope of “engaging” students. This was predicated not on research or evidence but on anecdote and a lack of knowledge and understanding. As I told my colleagues in my last school – I loved looking at and investigating timelines at school yet these were deemed to be universally “dull” by someone somewhere in the chain and therefore we were discouraged from using them.

    People who hated certain subjects have been elevated – see Jo Boaler – but what they miss out is why others loved it. What we ended up with was a situation where the things that people loved about subjects were stripped away in the hope they would engage those who hated it (without any sign of impact that it did do that).

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Pingback: …but how NOT to be SEDUCED by it. | Stepping Back a Little

  4. Pingback: In-Class Motivation – Part 1: BEING ENGAGED | Stepping Back a Little

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s